- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 16 October 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 8939/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 8939 of 2023 Petitioner :- M/S Archana Constructions Thru. Proprietor Archana Shukla Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Institutional Finance U.P. Govt. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Namit Sharma Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
¶1Sri Vijay Prakash, Advocate has filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent nos. 2 and 3, which is taken on record.
¶2Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel and Sri Vijay Prakash, learned Counsel representing respondent Nos.2 and 3.
¶3A similar matter has already been disposed of vide judgment dated 19.11.2015 in W.P. No. 10743(MB) of 2015, M/s Shatkashi Construction Company v. State of U.P. and others, which is not disputed by the learned counsel for the Nagar Nigam. Accordingly, this matter is also covered by the decision in the case of Tajveer Singh v. State of U.P. and others [1997 ALJ 285]. The petitioner shall also be entitled to the same benefits.
¶4With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition stands disposed off. (Manish Kumar, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.) Order Date :- 16.10.2023 Arjun/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.