- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 16 October 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 8941/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 8941 of 2023 Petitioner :- Bhoopendra Respondent :- State Of U.P. Addil. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Civil Secrt. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shiv Sharan Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the State/respondents. Petitioner has approached this Court for a mandamus commanding the opposite parties not to interfere in peaceful possession of petitioner and also permit the petitioner to construct his house on Gata No.412, situated at Village Bhediyari, Tehsil Kaiserganj, District Bahraich. The respondent nos.6 & 7, are private respondents and hence the relief is also sought with regard to private respondent nos. 6 & 7. However, during the course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner also states that it is the S.H.O. concerned who is interfering in the construction of house of the petitioner. Learned Standing Counsel, on instructions from respondent nos.3 & 5, states that Police has only taken action under Sections 107,116 of Cr.P.C. for maintaining law and order situation on the spot. No other interference is made by the Police. The aforesaid statement is taken on record with liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate suit against the private respondent in accordance with law. In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of. (Manish Kumar, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.) Order Date :- 16.10.2023 Arjun/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.