- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 16 October 2023
- Bench
- Pankaj Bhatia
- Case no.
- 8015/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 8 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8015 of 2023 Petitioner :- Naseeb Ahmed Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Nagar Vikas Vibhag Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Yogesh Singh,Anurag Bhadauria,Rajneesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Surya Prakash Singh Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
¶1Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents no.1 to 4 as well as Ms. Anupama Bhadauria holding brief of Sri Surya Prakash Singh, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no.5.
¶2The present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 28.04.2023, whereby the directions have been issued to the respondent no.5 to refix the pay of the petitioner on the grounds indicated in the order.
¶3The Counsel for the petitioner argues that the pay cannot be refixed after retirement, however, the fact remains that the respondent no.5 has yet not passed any order, the present writ petition is disposed off directing the respondent no.5 to hear the petitioner before passing any order in terms of the directions issued on 28.04.2023.
¶4The petitioner would be at liberty to challenge any fresh order that has been passed by the respondent no.5, in accordance with law. Order Date :- 16.10.2023 akverma High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.