Neelam Enterprises Reg.No. 09Aejpv5217M2Zs Lko. Branch Thru. Proprietor Ajay Kumar Verma v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Basic Education U.P. Govt. Civil Secrt.Lko. and Others

Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9043 of 2023 Petitioner :- Neelam Enterprises Reg.No. 09aejpv5217m2zs Lko. Branch Thru. Proprietor Ajay Kumar Verma Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Basic Education U.P. Govt. Civil Secrt.Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Raj Kr Singh Suryvanshi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rishabh Tripathi Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned standing counsel for State and Sri Rishabh Tripathi, learned counsel for respondent nos. 4 and 5. Present writ petition is filed by the petitioner claiming that for the following primary relief:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party no.2 to sanction the necessary funds and ensure the payment of outstanding dues in the tune of Rs.7,41,482/- (Rupees seven lakh fourty one thousand four hundred eighty two only) for the year 2021-22 along with interest @ 18% per annum." Learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of petitioner would be sufÏciently met in case representation of petitioner for the said purposes is considered and decided in a time bound manner. Learned counsel for respondents have no objection to the same. In view thereof, petitioner is permitted to make a fresh detailed representation to respondent no.2 Director, Basic Education Department, U.P., Lucknow, raising all his grievance, annexing therewith a copy of this writ petition along with annexures and all the documents in support of his claim within a period of two weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. In case such a representation is moved by petitioner, respondent no.2 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order along with representation is placed before him. It is made clear that this court has not applied itself on the merits of the case and all questions are left open to be considered and decided by the competent authority in accordance with law. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of. (Manish Kumar, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.) Order Date :- 17.10.2023 Nitesh High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench