- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 17 October 2023
- Bench
- Saurabh Lavania
- Case no.
- 9052/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9052 of 2023 Petitioner :- Radhey Shyam Verma Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Deptt. Of Revenue,Lko. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajneesh Kumar Pandey,Dinesh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard. By means of the present petition, an order dated 12.06.2023 passed by the opposite party No.4-Tehsildar, Tehsil-Baldirai, District-Sultanpur, in a case instituted under Section 67(1) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, registered as Case No.T-201804680901148, has been assailed by the petitioner. Prima facie, it appears that petitioner is not an aggrieved party, however, without observing anything on the locus of the petitioner, this Court, in the facts and circumstances of the case, is not inclined to entertain the present petition and leaving it open to petitioner to avail the remedy as provided under the law and if the petitioner avails the remedy provided under the law, the authority concerned, before entering into the merits of the case, shall deal with the locus of the petitioner. With the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 17.10.2023 Vinay/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.