- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 17 October 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 9049/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9049 of 2023 Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Respondent :- Distt. Magistrate , Unnao And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Piyush Pathak Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Supplementary afÏdavit filed today by learned counsel for the petitioner is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Dilip Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent no. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file a representation before the respondent no. 2 i.e. the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Safipur, District Unnao. In case such a representation is moved by petitioner within a period of one week from today, the respondent no.2 i.e. the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Safipur, District Unnao, shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of four weeks from the date a certified copy of this order along with representation is placed before him. Writ petition is consigned to record. (Manish Kumar, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.) Order Date :- 17.10.2023 Nitesh High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.