- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 17 October 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 9045/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9045 of 2023 Petitioner :- Jeetendra Singh @ Lal Sahab Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 11 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Brijesh Kumar Mishra,Amod Kumar Singh,Tara Chand Seth Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Pankaj Gupta, learned counsel for the Gaon Sabha. Petitioner has approached this Court claiming that the certain obstructions are being raised on the Chak Marg and the same is not being removed / corrected. Learned Standing counsel as well as learned counsel for the Gaon Sabha states that the petitioner has an alternative remedy to file an application under Section 26 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, before the Assistant Collector concerned. In case, such application is filed, the concerned Assistant Collector shall consider and decide the same after hearing all the parties concerned within period of two weeks. With the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of. . [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 17.10.2023 S. Kumar High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.