Rana Gulab Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Revenue Civil Secrt. Lko and Others

Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9061 of 2023 Petitioner :- Rana Gulab Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Revenue Civil Secrt. Lko And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anand Prakash Pandey,Dr.Surya Prakash Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Abhishek Tiwari Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State as well as Sri Lakshya Deep Srivastava holding brief of Sri Shishir Jain, learned counsel for respondent nos.4 and 5.

¶2Present writ petition is filed by petitioner for the following main reliefs: "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding and directing the opposite parties to make payment of compensation of acquired land of the petitioner area measuring 304 Sq. Mt. from land of the petitioner Gata No.2240 situated at Village Barausa, Tehsil-Sadar, District-Sultanpur.

(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding and directing the opposite party no.5 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 20.07.2023 (contained at Annexure No.6 to this writ petition)."

¶3Learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of petitioner would be sufficiently met in case representation of petitioner for the said purposes is considered and decided in a time bound manner.

¶4Learned counsel for respondents have no objection to the same.

¶5In view thereof, petitioner is permitted to make a fresh detailed representation to respondent no.5-Deputy Project Manager, Bridge Construction Unit, U.P. State Bridge Corporation Ltd., Sultanpur, Railway Over Bridge 74-B Prayagraj Road, Laxmanpur, District Sultanpur, raising all his grievance, annexing therewith a copy of this writ petition along with annexures and all the documents in support of his claim within a period of two weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order.

¶6In case such a representation is moved by petitioner, respondent no.5 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of two months from the date, a certified copy of this order along with representation is placed before him.

¶7It is made clear that this court has not applied itself on the merits of the case and all questions are left open to be considered and decided by the competent authority in accordance with law.

¶8With the aforesaid directions, present writ petition is disposed of. [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 17.10.2023 Sachin High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench