VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Smt. Meena Dhawan v. Shri V.K. Upadhya, Director Ground Water Deptt. U.P. Lko. and Another

Dismissed on merits/Rejected
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
17 October 2023
Bench
Rajesh Singh Chauhanauthor
Case no.
2216/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 4 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2216 of 2023 Applicant :- Smt. Meena Dhawan Opposite Party :- Shri V.K. Upadhya, Director Ground Water Deptt. U.P. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ashok Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- Avinash Dube Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.

¶1Heard.

¶2This Court has passed order dated 03.10.2023, which reads as under:- "1. Heard Sri Ashok Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Avinash Dube, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2.

¶2Sri Dube has filed short counter affidavit indicating therein that the order of Writ Court has been complied with.

¶3Sri Ashok Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner has raised objection in the aforesaid submission by submitting that a sum of Rs. 4,59,617/- was recovered from the amount of gratuity of the petitioner vide impugned order dated 02.05.2022 and the Writ Court has quashed the impugned order dated 02.05.2022 on 09.11.2022. Therefore, Sri Mishra has stated that when the impugned order dated 02.05.2022 has been quashed by the Writ Court on 09.11.2022, the aforesaid amount should be paid to the petitioner forthwith but such amount has not been paid to the petitioner till date.

¶4List on 17th of October, 2023.

¶5On or before 17th of October, 2023, the opposite party no. 2 shall file the affidavit of compliance, making compliance of the order of Writ Court in it's letter and spirit, more particularly apprising the Court as to whether the sum of Rs.4,59,617/-, which has been recovered from the petitioner pursuant to the order dated 02.05.2022, has been paid to the petitioner or not. Failing which, opposite party no. 2, namely, Sri Amod Kumar, Executive Engineer Ground Water Department Khand Yantrik M.I.G.-11, Phage-1, Kaushalpuri Colony, Ayodhya, District Ayodhya, shall appear in person."

¶3In compliance of the aforesaid order, Sri Avinash Dube, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 has filed affidavit of compliance, the same is taken on record.

¶4As per the aforesaid affidavit of compliance, the appropriate order has been passed on 05.10.2023 by the Executive Engineer for making payment of a sum of Rs.4,59,617/-, which was recovered from the petitioner pursuant to the order dated

02.05.2022. Further attention has been drawn towards the order dated 09.10.2023 whereby the Executive Engineer has preferred a letter to the Additional Director (Treasury and Pension), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya requesting that a sum of Rs.4,59,617/- be paid to the petitioner and revised PPO to that effect be issued with expedition.

¶5In the wake of aforesaid development, there is no purpose to keep this contempt petition pending any longer.

¶6Accordingly, this contempt petition is dismissed.

¶7Notices are discharged.

¶8However, it is expected that the aforesaid amount shall be credited in the account of the petitioner within fifteen days, to be more precise on or before 31.10.2023, failing which liberty is given to the petitioner to file an application in this contempt petition seeking revival of this contempt petition. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 17.10.2023 RBS/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.