- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 18 October 2023
- Bench
- Sangeeta Chandra, Karunesh Singh Pawar
- Case no.
- 8088/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8088 of 2023 Petitioner :- Becha Lal Yadav And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Civil Secrt. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vishun Narain Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.
1.Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2.Present writ petition has been filed with following main relief : i.Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned first information report dated 05/10/2023 lodged by the opposite party No.4 against the petitioners others at Police Station - Indira Nagar. District Lucknow (North) which was registered as FIR/CaseCrime
No.352/2023
UnderSection
147/148/149/452/ 427/323/308/307/504/506/3791.P.C.Police Station-Indira Nagar, District-. Lucknow (North), as contained in Annexure No. 1 to this Writ petition in respect of the petitioners. ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the opposite parties not to arrest the petitioners in pursuance of the impugned first Information Report dated 05/10/2023 lodged by the opposite party No.4 against the petitioners others at Police Station - Indira Nagar, District-Lucknow (North) which was registered as FIR/CaseCrimeNo.352/2023
Under
Section
147/148/149/452/ 427/323/308/307/504/506/3791.P.C.Police Station-Indira Nagar, District-. Lucknow (North) Rural as contained in Annexure No.1 to this writ petition."
3.It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioner No.1 is 75 years old and he looks after the temple. The informant (respondent No.4) belongs to a gang of persons who wanted to take over the temple, of which petitioner No.1 takes care of. He further submits that there is no injury but sections 307 and 308 I.P.C. have falsely been added.
4.Learned A.G.A. has produced before this court extract of the copy of case diary and the instructions sent by Sub Inspector Asit Yadav, P.S. Indira Nagar, district Lucknow. The copy of case diary shows that at least four persons were injured. It has been stated in the case diary that petitioner No.1 Becha Lal Yadav and his son Ajay Kumar Yadav, and Mohan Chauhan and Kullan Yadav assaulted the injured. There are at least four persons injured who received abrasion and contusion injuries. Instructions and copy of the relevant extract of the case diary are kept on record.
5.I have gone through the first information report and find no good ground to show interference.
6.The petition is dismissed. Order Date :- 18.10.2023 kkb/ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.