- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 18 October 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 9157/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9157 of 2023 Petitioner :- Devendra Kumar Awasthi Totally Blind And Disabled Person Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Ministry Revenue Civil Secrt. Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manju Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned standing counsel for State.
¶2Present writ petition is filed with the following prayers:- "(i) Issue of a writ in nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties no.2 to 5 to allot the land Gata no.1495 measuring 0.251 Hectare situate at village Faliapur Pargana Bangar Tehsil and Distt Hardoi and the opposite party no.2 to 5 may be commanded not to create any hindrance in the peaceful possession use and enjoyment of the petitioners in and over the said land in question in any manner whatsoever.
(ii) Issue of a writ order or directions in nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties no.1 and 2 to decide the representation of the petitioner for the redressal of their grievance as contained in annexure no.4 and 5 to this writ petition and save the rights of the petitioner relating to the land Gata no.1495 measuring 0.254 Hectare situate at village Faliapur Pargana Bangar Tehsil and Distt Hardoi"
¶3Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner's representation is pending before respondent no.2 and grievance of petitioner would sufficiently be met in case a fresh representation of petitioner for the said purposes is considered and decided in a time bound manner.
¶4Learned standing counsel has no objection to the same.
¶5In view thereof, petitioner is permitted to make a fresh detailed representation to respondent no.2-District Magistrate, Hardoi raising all his grievance, annexing therewith a copy of this writ petition along with annexures and all the documents in support of his claim within a period of two weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order.
¶6In case such a representation is moved by petitioner, respondent no.2 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order along with representation is placed before him.
¶7It is made clear that this court has not applied itself on the merits of the case and all questions are left open to be considered and decided by the competent authority in accordance with law.
¶8With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. . [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 18.10.2023 -Amit K-High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.