VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ram Dulary v. Naib Tahsildar Siddhaur, Tahsil Haidergarh, Barabanki and Another

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
18 October 2023
Bench
Saurabh Lavaniaauthor
Case no.
5381/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 18 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5381 of 2023 Petitioner :- Ram Dulary Respondent :- Naib Tahsildar Siddhaur, Tahsil Haidergarh, Barabanki And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Mukesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondents is hereby dispensed with. The present petition has been filed for the following main relief:- "i. Issue a direction commanding the opposite party no.1 i.e. Naib Tahsildar Siddhaur, Tahsil Haidergarh, District Barabanki to decide the mutation case, bearing Case No. T-2017041248056679 (Ram Dulary Vs. Kanhaiyalal) (Under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code 2006) filed by the Petitioner for the mutation on the basis of Registered Will Deed dated

08.12.1997 expeditiously within fixed period which may be think proper by this Hon'ble Court." It is stated that as per Rule 34(7) of U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016 made under the U.P. Revenue Code, the mutation proceedings being summary in nature, ought to have been decided preferably within 45 days if there is no dispute and if there is dispute, the same ought to have been decided preferably within 90 days. However, the proceedings which were initiated by the petitioner in the year 2017, have not been concluded till date. In these circumstances, the indulgence of this Court is required. It is further submitted that though a large number of dates have been fixed, however, for the reasons beyond control, the matter has not yet been decided. Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed. Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending. Accordingly, in the ends of justice the respondent No.-1/Naib Tahsildar Siddhaur, Tahsil Haidergarh, District Barabanki is directed to consider and decide the pending proceedings of Case No. T-2017041248056679 (Ram Dulary Vs. Kanhaiyalal) most expeditiously, after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties preferably within three months from the next date fixed before it, if there is no other legal impediment in this regard. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 18.10.2023 Jyoti/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.