Suhail Ahmad v. U.P Jal Nigam Urban Thru. Managing Director Lko and 3 Others

Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8116 of 2023 Petitioner :- Suhail Ahmad Respondent :- U.P Jal Nigam Urban Thru. Managing Director Lko And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Raj Kumar Dwivedi,Savita Jain Counsel for Respondent :- Rishabh Kapoor Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.

¶1Heard Ms. Savita Jain, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri Rishabh Kapoor, learned counsel for respondents.

¶2With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is finally being disposed of.

¶3The petitioner claims to have retired in the year 2022, but till date gratuity and leave encashment have not been paid.

¶4In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with the directions to the respondent no.3/The Chief Accounts Officer, U.P. Jal Nigam (Urban), Lucknow to calculate/determine the post retiral dues payable to the petitioner and pay the admissible dues subject to the fulfillment of the required formalities by the petitioner as per law positively within a period of two months and while doing so they shall also take a decision as regards the interest payable on delayed amount as per provisions in the rules and orders in this regard from the date it became due and till date it is actually paid.

¶5With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition is finally disposed of. Order Date :- 18.10.2023 A. Katiyar High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench