- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 18 October 2023
- Bench
- Shree Prakash Singh
- Case no.
- 10219/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 28 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10219 of 2023 Applicant :- Umesh Sahu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Raghuvansha Pratap Singh,Rajiv Kumar Bajpai Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Suparna Mishra Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J. Ms. Suparna Mishra, Advocate has put in appearance by filing Vakalatnama on behalf of the opposite party no.2 and the same is taken on record. Heard Sri Rajiv Kumar Bajpai,learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Anirudha Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A.-1 for the State, Ms. Suparna Mishra, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and perused the record. By means of the instant application, the applicants have prayed for quashing of the impugned summoning order dated 01-05-2017 and the chargesheet dated 13-04-2017 passed by the Upper Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barabanki, Court No. 19, in Crl. Case No. 542 of 2017, arising out of Case Crime No. 83 of 2016(State Vs. Umesh Sahu), U/s 498-A,323 of I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station-Loni Katra, District-Barabanki. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the matter pertains to the matrimonial dispute and due to some misunderstanding the instant FIR was lodged and thereafter the parties sat together and they have settled their dispute and that too has been reduced in writing as a compromise deed dated
20.05.2023. Adding his arguments, he submits that now the parties have put their all disputes at rest by way of executing compromise deed and thus further criminal proceedings against the present applicant would be a futile exercise and amount to harassment of the applicant. Adding his arguments, he also submits that this Hon'ble Court vide order dated 20.05.2023 has referred the matter for compromise verification in Application U/S 482 Cr.P.C. No. 5425 of 2023 and in compliance of the aforesaid order, both the parties have appeared before the court below and the compromise deed dated 20.05.2023 has been verified in presence of all concerned parties and the order of verification was passed on 04.07.2023 by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.19, Barabanki. He next added that now the matter has been compromised between the parties, and as such the proceedings of Criminal Case No.542 of 2017 (State of U.P. versus Umesh Sahu) arising out of Case Crime No. 83 of 2016, under Sections 498-A and 323 of IPC and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station-Loni Katra, District -Barabanki, may be quashed. On the other hand, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 has also supported the version of the applicants and submits that the parties have entered into compromise deed and now there is no dispute in between the parties and thus the criminal proceeding against the applicant may be dropped. On the other hand, learned AGA appearing for the State has no objection to the contentions aforesaid. Considering the aforesaid submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, I find that compromise has been entered into between the parties on 20.05.2023 and said compromise has been verified on 04.07.2023 and, now, as per the statement of learned counsel for the parties, they do not want to press the aforementioned State versus Umesh Sahu, arising out of aforementioned Case Crime No. 83 of 2016. In view of the above, as the applicants and opposite parties have entered into compromise on
18.12.2021 and no grievance remains to be agitated and as such, further criminal proceedings in the aforementioned criminal case are liable to be set aside in view of the Judgements of the Apex Court rendered in B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and another (2003)4 SCC 675; Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation[2008)9 SCC 677]; Manoj Sharma Vs. State and others ( 2008) 16 SCC 1; Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303; and Narindra Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab ( 2014) 6 SCC 466. Resultantly, the proceedings of Criminal Case No.542 of 2017 (State of U.P. versus Umesh Sahu) arising out of Case Crime No. 83 of 2016, under Sections 498-A and 323 of IPC and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station-Loni Katra, District -Barabanki, are hereby quashed. The compromise deed shall be part of this order. Consequences to be followed. The application is allowed accordingly. Order Date :- 18.10.2023 AKS High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.