- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 18 October 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 9120/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9120 of 2023 Petitioner :- Naseemullah And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Deptt. U.P. Govt. Civil Secrt. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Alok Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for parties.
¶2The grievance raised by the petitioner in the present writ petition is with regard to interference by private respondent.
¶3The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not maintainable. The petitioner has liberty to approach the appropriate Court/authority in accordance with law.
¶4With the aforesaid liberty, present writ petition is consigned to record. (Manish Kumar, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.) Order Date :- 18.10.2023 Arjun/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.