Santosh v. State of U.P Thru. Addil. Chief Secy. Prin. Secy./ Prin. Secy. Revenue and 4 Others

Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9247 of 2023 Petitioner :- Santosh Respondent :- State Of U.P Thru. Addil. Chief Secy. Prin. Secy./ Prin. Secy. Revenue And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- J.P. Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. The sole submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the private respondents have forged documents of property of petitioner and they have started raising construction. Since the dispute is between private parties, therefore, this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India does not have jurisdiction to entertain the present writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to file a suit or approach appropriate authority in accordance with law. The writ petition is consigned to record. . [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 18.10.2023 S. Kumar High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench