- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 18 October 2023
- Bench
- Rajnish Kumar
- Case no.
- 5179/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5179 of 2023 Petitioner :- Sudha Yadav Respondent :- Addl. Principal Judge, Court No. 7, Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohd. Ghayasuddin Khan Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J. Sri Mohd. Ghayasuddin Khan learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed Case no.610 of 2022 (Sudha Yadav vs Brajlal Yadav and others) under Section 25 of the Gaurdiand and Wards Act 1890, for guardianship of opposite party no.3. He further submits that the pleadings have been exchanged and the issues have to be framed but the case is being adjourned for one or the other reason. He further submits that there is urgency in the matter because the opposite party no.3 would become major on 12.11.2023. Considering the nature of the order proposed to be passed in this petition, the issuance of notice to the opposite parties is dispensed with. The petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move an application for expeditious disposal of the Case no.610 of 2022 (Sudha Yadav vs Brajlal Yadav and others) before the court concerned. In case, any such application is moved by the next date fixed, which is said to be 23.10.2023, the concerned court shall consider the same on the date fixed or within a further period of two weeks thereafter in accordance with law considering the ground of urgency in the matter and pass appropriate order thereon and proceed accordingly. (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Order Date :- 18.10.2023 Harshita High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.