- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 18 October 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 27503/2021
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 27503 of 2021 Petitioner :- Nagendra Prasad Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Uma Kant Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Namit Sharma Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard Sri Uma Kant Gupta, learned counsel, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Ms. Priyanka Singh, Advocate holding brief of Sri Namit Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 3 & 4. Petitioner has approached this Court against the demand of house tax issued against him which is up to 31.03.2022. It does not state from the entire period of the demand which is made under the same. Petitioner has already submitted his reply on 29.09.2020 to the Nagar Ayukt, Nagar Nigam, Lucknow. Learned counsel for the Nagar Nigam, on instructions states that reply of the petitioner be considered and decided expeditiously. Under the given circumstances, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 4 i.e. Zonal OfÏcer, Nagar Nigam, Zone No. 8, District Lucknow to consider and decide the reply of the petitioner within a period of four weeks by passing a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and provide a copy of the same to the petitioner. Any demand against the petitioner shall be subject to final orders passed in furtherance of aforesaid order of this Court. (Manish Kumar, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.) Order Date :- 18.10.2023 Nitesh High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.