- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 18 October 2023
- Bench
- Pankaj Bhatia
- Case no.
- WRIC 1006524/2013
Judgment
Court No. - 8 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1006524 of 2013 Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Sahu Respondent :- Additional District Judge Room No.3 Distt.Lucknow And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- A.Z. Siddiqui Counsel for Respondent :- Manish Kumar,Nirmit Srivastava,Surya Kant,Udit Kumar Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
¶1The present petition has been filed challenging an order whereby the injunction was refused to be granted and the appeal preferred by the petitioner was dismissed.
¶2The finding recorded by the appellate court are clear that the petitioner could not establish his possession over the property in question.
¶3Considering the findings of fact, which are recorded, I do not see any reason to exercise powers under Article 226 or even under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
¶4Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed.
¶5The petitioner would be at liberty to get the suit decided in accordance with law with all expedition.
¶6This order has been passed in the presence of Sri Sanjay Srivastava holding brief of Sri Nirmit Srivastava, learned Counsel for the respondent. Order Date :- 18.10.2023 akverma High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.