VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ram Achal v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Panchayati Raj, U.P. Lucknow and 4 Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
19 October 2023
Bench
Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
Case no.
WRIC 9208/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9208 of 2023 Petitioner :- Ram Achal Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Panchayati Raj, U.P. Lucknow And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pradeep Kumar Shukla,Skand Bajpai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the State. Present writ petition is filed by the petitioner with the following relief:- "i. a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the opposite party no. 2 to ensure issuance of family register indicating death of petitioner's father namely Tularam and death certificate in furtherance of petitioner's application dated 01.09.2022, contained in Annexure no. 1, to this writ petition." Petitioner claims that proceedings for muting the details of death of his father which took place in the year 2004 are pending before the Sub Divisional Magistrate-Utraula, District Balrampur. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of petitioner would be substantially met in case representation of petitioner for the said purposes is considered and decided in a time bound manner. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the same. In view thereof, petitioner is permitted to make a fresh detailed representation to respondent no.2-Sub Divisional Magistrate, Utraula, District Balrampur, raising all his grievance, annexing therewith a copy of this writ petition along with annexures and all the documents in support of his claim within a period of two weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. In case such a representation is moved by petitioner, respondent no.2, shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of three months from the date a certified copy of this order along with representation is placed before him. It is made clear that this court has not applied itself on the merits of the case and all questions are left open to be considered and decided by the competent authority in accordance with law. With the aforesaid directions, present writ petition is disposed of. (Manish Kumar, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.) Order Date :- 19.10.2023 Nitesh High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.