Smt. Manju Singh Singhla v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Home Lko

Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12433 of 2023 Applicant :- Smt. Manju Singh Singhla Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Vivek Chandra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.

¶1Heard Sri Vivek Chandra, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Rakesh Kumar Singh, the learned AGA for the State and perused the records.

¶2The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.10 of 2023, under Sections 420, 406, 447, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC, Police Station Kotwali Nagar District Barabanki.

¶3The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 04.01.2023 against 4 persons, not including the applicant, stating that the applicant had purchased a plot of land from M/s Singla Developers in the year, 2013. It is alleged that when the informant went to the land in question the boundary wall constructed by him had been removed. It is further stated in the FIR that subsequently informant came to know that the land had been sold to some other person.

¶4In the affidavit filed in support of the application, it has been stated that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case.

¶5The applicant's criminal history of 20 other cases has been disclosed, in 9 of which, the applicant has been granted bail. The applicant has already been granted bail in 9 other cases arising out of similar dispute.

¶6The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but he could not dispute the aforesaid aspects of the matter.

¶7Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the land in question was purchased from Singla Developers of which Sanjay Singh Singla is the proprietor, in the year, 2013 and it is stated that the informant had got possession of the land and constructed boundary wall thereon; that the FIR alleges that some person had removed boundary wall constructed by the informant but this allegation has not been levelled against the applicant and that the applicant is languishing in jail since 03.06.2022 and without making any observation, which may affect the merits of the case, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in the present case.

¶8Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed.

¶9Let the applicant-Smt. Manju Singh Singhla be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-

(i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence;

(ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses;

(iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. . (Subhash Vidyarthi, J.) Order Date :- 19.10.2023 Ram. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench