VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Koteshwar v. Additional Commissioner (Judicial Ist), Lko. Division, Lko. and 2 Others

Dismissed on merits/Rejected
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
19 October 2023
Bench
Saurabh Lavaniaauthor
Case no.
9204/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9204 of 2023 Petitioner :- Koteshwar Respondent :- Additional Commissioner (Judicial Ist), Lko. Division, Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vivek Kumar Tripathi,Sudhir Kumar Misra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. By means of this petition, the petitioner has sought the following main reliefs:- "(I) Issue a Writ, Order or Direction in the nature of Certiorari to quash the impugned order dated 29-08-2023 passed by opposite party No.1 in petitioner's transfer application Computerized Case No. C202310000000169 "Koteshawr v/s Sub Divisional Officer, Dalmau Sri Asha Ram Verma & Others" by the opposite party No.1 i.e. Additional Commissioner Judicial, Lucknow contained as Annexure No. 1 to this petition, in the interest of justice.

(II) Issue a Writ, Order or Direction in the nature of Mandamus to transfer the petitioner's application Computerized Case No. C2022105580500759 under section 144 of the U.P. RC2006 pending in the Court of opposite party No.2, in the interest of justice." The main ground to seek transfer of the case in issue as indicated by the petitioner's counsel taken in the application for transfer is as under:- "6.

यहकककदनननक20-01-2013

ककनयनयलयककचपरनससनकपनररकक

बबलनयनऔरकहनतबमकक1

लनखरपयनदकननपड़कगनतभसमबक़दमकममकबछ

आदकशहकपनयकगनअनयरनतबमहनरनमबकदमनख़नररजहकजनयकगन।" As perusal of above quoted para shows that the allegations against the Presiding Officer concerned appears to be completely vague and mis-conceived. It is settled principal of law that mere suspicion by the party that he will not get justice would not justify transfer. There must be a reasonable apprehension to that effect. A judicial order made by a Judge legitimately cannot be made foundation for a transfer of case. Mere presumption of possible apprehension should not and ought not be the basis of transfer of any case from one Court to another. It is only in very special circumstances, when such grounds are taken, the Court must find reasons exist to transfer a case, not otherwise. Reference can be made to the judgment dated 12.11.2014 passed in Transfer Application (Civil) No. 519 of 2014 (Amit Agarwal vs. Atul Gupta). In view of aforesaid, the present petition is dismissed. Order Date :- 19.10.2023 Arun/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.