Amar Nath Pandey v. U.P. Projects Cororation Ltd. Thru. Director Regustered Office Lko and Another

Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9324 of 2023 Petitioner :- Amar Nath Pandey Respondent :- U.P. Projects Cororation Ltd. Thru. Director Regustered Office Lko And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Brijesh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- I.M. Pandey Ist Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for petitioner and Shri I.M. Pandey Ist, learned counsel for the respondents.

¶2Present writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking following relief:- "i. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding to the opposite party no. 2 to consider and make the outstanding payment. ii. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding to the opposite party no. 2 to consider and decide the representation dated 28/07/2023 contained as Annexure No. 5 to this writ petition with in stipulated time."

¶3Learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of petitioner would sufficiently be met in case representation of petitioner for the said purposes is considered and decided in a time bound manner.

¶4Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to the same.

¶5In view thereof, petitioner is permitted to make a fresh detailed representation to respondent no.2-Project Manager, U.P. Projects Corporation Limited, Unit-11, Nansa Kothi Reedganj Devakali Road, District-Ayodhya, raising all his grievance, annexing therewith a copy of this writ petition along with annexures and all the documents in support of his claim within a period of two weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order.

¶6In case such a representation is moved by petitioner, respondent no.2 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order along with representation is placed before him.

¶7It is made clear that this court has not applied itself on the merits of the case and all questions are left open to be considered and decided by the competent authority in accordance with law.

¶8With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. . [Manish Kumar, J.] [Vivek Chaudhary, J.] Order Date :- 19.10.2023 -Amit K-High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench