- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 19 October 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 9295/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9295 of 2023 Petitioner :- Sona Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrt. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar Yadav,Balram Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for parties.
¶2Present writ petition is filed by petitioner for a direction to be issued to the respondents to provide proper compensation to the petitioner under the 'Mukhyamantri Krishak Durghatna Kalyan Yojna' as per Government Orders dated 28.2.2020 and 2.3.2020 with a further prayer to decide the application dated 20.9.2023 moved by petitioner in this regard, which is pending before the District Magistrate, Raebareli.
¶3Learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case claim of the petitioner is considered and decided by respondent no.3-District Magistrate, Raebareli in a time bound manner.
¶4Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the same.
¶5In view thereof, petitioner is permitted to make a fresh detailed representation to respondent no.3-District Magistrate, Raebareli, raising all her grievance, annexing therewith a copy of this writ petition along with annexures and all the documents in support of her claim within a period of two weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order.
¶6In case such a representation is moved by petitioner, respondent no.3 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of two months from the date, a certified copy of this order along with representation is placed before him.
¶7The writ petition stands disposed of. [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 19.10.2023 Sachin High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.