- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 19 October 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 9227/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9227 of 2023 Petitioner :- Jai Narayan Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru.Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Deptt. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mritunjay Tiwari,Sudeep Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State. After arguing at some length, counsel for the petitioner states that grievance of petitioner would be substantially met in case his interim relief application in proceedings under Section 35 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, pending before the court of Tehsildar is considered and decided in a time bound manner. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of above, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 3 i.e. Tehsildar, Tehsil Amethi, District Amethi to consider and decide the case of the petitioner in accordance with law after hearing the parties concerned within a period of three weeks from the date of production/receipt of certified copy of this order. This Court has not entered into the merits of the case. (Manish Kumar, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.) Order Date :- 19.10.2023 Nitesh High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.