Vijay Kumar Tiwari v. Shri Pravin Tripathi, Branch Manager, Punjab National Bank, Ayodhya

Court No. - 4 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3662 of 2023 Applicant :- Vijay Kumar Tiwari Opposite Party :- Shri Pravin Tripathi, Branch Manager, Punjab National Bank, Ayodhya Counsel for Applicant :- Mahesh Kumar Sharma Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Mayank Pathak, learned counsel, who has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent-Bank.

¶2Attention has been drawn towards an order of the Writ Court dated 25.09.2023 passed in Writ-C No.7963 of 2023. The order dated 25.09.2023 reads as under:- "Heard Sri Mahesh Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Mayank Pathak, learned counsel for the respondent-Bank. Petitioner has approached this Court praying that the respondent-Bank may be permitted to get operated his account which has wrongly been seized. Sri Mayank Pathak, learned counsel for the respondent-Bank on instructions states that the account is seized as a direction is given by the Telangana Police in a criminal case. He assures the Court that copy of the orders of the Telangana Police will be provided to the petitioner within three days from today. The aforesaid statement is taken on record. Writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the said order in accordance with law."

¶3Sri Mayank Pathak, learned counsel for the respondent-Bank has informed that in compliance of order of the Writ Court the copy of the letter dated 04.07.2023 has been provided to the petitioner on

04.07.2023, as the receipt to that effect has been shown to the Court, which is taken on record.

¶4In the wake of the aforesaid development, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant contempt petition.

¶5Accordingly, the instant contempt petition is dismissed.

¶6Consign to records. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 19.10.2023 Suresh/ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench