Sarfraj v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. /Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. and 13 Others

Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9333 of 2023 Petitioner :- Sarfraj Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. /Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 13 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar Nayak Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for State.

¶2Admittedly, the dispute is between petitioner and private respondents no.7 to 14 with regard to possession of land in dispute. The same is dispute between private parties, hence, this Court under Article 226 of Constitution of India can not entertain present writ petition.

¶3Accordingly, present writ petition is consigned to record with liberty to petitioner to file a civil suit along with appropriate stay application before appropriate Court. In case such stay application is filed by petitioner, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law. Order Date :- 19.10.2023 Arti/- [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench