Sharfuddin and Others v. State of U.P. Ministry of Urban Development Thru. Prin. Secy. Lucknow and Others

Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9341 of 2023 Petitioner :- Sharfuddin And Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Ministry Of Urban Development Thru. Prin. Secy. Lucknow And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anshuman Srivastava,Mohd. Murtaza Hasan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Namit Sharma Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for petitioners, Sri K.K. Pandey, learned counsel for respondent no.2 and 3 and learned standing counsel for State. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for petitioners submits that grievance of petitioners would be sufficiently met in case representation of petitioners dated 03.10.2023 (annexure no.1) under the provisions of Section 503(6) and 516 of U.P. Municipality Act, 1959 is considered and decided in a time bound manner. Learned counsel for respondents have no objection to the same. In view thereof, petitioners are permitted to make a fresh detailed representation(s) to respondent no.2 Municipal Commissioner, Lucknow Municipal Corporation, Lucknow, raising all their grievance, annexing therewith a copy of this writ petition along with annexures and all the documents in support of their claim within a period of two weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. In case such a representation is moved by petitioner, respondent no.2 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order along with representation is placed before him. It is made clear that this court has not applied itself on the merits of the case and all questions are left open to be considered and decided by the competent authority in accordance with law. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 19.10.2023 Arti/- [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench