M/S Hind Security Force (A Proprietorship Concern) Thru. Proprietor Mr. Ram Nihal Choudhary v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Infrastructure and Industrial Development Lko. and Others

Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9245 of 2023 Petitioner :- M/S Hind Security Force (A Proprietorship Concern) Thru. Proprietor Mr. Ram Nihal Choudhary Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Infrastructure And Industrial Development Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amrendra Nath Tripathi,Anjana Rai,Pramod Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Jogendra Nath Verma,Shivendra S Singh Rathore Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to correct the array of parties during course of the day. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Jogendra Nath Verma, learned counsel for Respondent No.2 and Shri Shivendra S Singh Rathore, learned counsel for Opposite Parties Nos.3 and 4 and perused the record. Petitioner has approached this court challenging the letters whereby fresh tenders are being called by the respondent while agreement of petitioner is in existence. Learned counsel for Respondent Nos.3 and 4 Shri Shivendra S Singh Rathore, learned Advocate on instructions states that the petitioner's agreement are existing and the tender process is initiated for future purposes only without disturbing the agreements of the petitioner, which is effect upto 31.03.2023, statement is taken on record. The writ petition is consigned to record. It always open for the petitioner with regard to payment of dues to make representation before the appropriate respondent, who shall consider and decide the same expeditiously. . [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 19.10.2023 S. Kumar High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench