VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Seema v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. and 2 Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
19 October 2023
Bench
Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
Case no.
WRIC 9264/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9264 of 2023 Petitioner :- Seema Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the State. The present writ petition has been filed with the following main prayer: "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Opposite Parties particularly Opposite Party No.2 to compensate the petitioner as per the scheme of the Kisan Durghatna Beema Scheme as monetary assistance for death of the deceased husband who was farmer under the scheme of the State Government i.e. Rs.500000/- on account of the accident death of her husband without any further delay." Learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of petitioner would be substantially met in case representation of petitioner for the said purposes is considered and decided in a time bound manner. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the same. In view thereof, petitioner is permitted to make a fresh detailed representation to respondent no.2-District Magistrate, District - Sultanpur, raising all his grievance, annexing therewith a copy of this writ petition along with annexures and all the documents in support of his claim within a period of two weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. In case the representation is already decided, the respondent shall provide a copy of this order to the petitioner. In case such a representation is moved by petitioner, respondent no.2, shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order along with representation is placed before him. It is made clear that this court has not applied itself on the merits of the case and all questions are left open to be considered and decided by the competent authority in accordance with law. With the aforesaid directions, present writ petition is disposed of. . [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 19.10.2023 S. Kumar High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.