VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Akarsh Agarwal and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
19 October 2023
Bench
Rajeev Singhauthor
Case no.
7321/2018

Judgment

Court No. - 12 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7321 of 2018 Applicant :- Akarsh Agarwal And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mohan Lal,Anurag Rai,Surya Narayan Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Ajit S. Gaherwwar,Km. Prem Prakasheni,Satya Narain Mishra Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶2The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is filed with the prayer to quash the proceeding of Case No.41978 of 2018, arising out of Case Crime No.294/2017 under Section 498-A, 323, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station Alambgah, District Lucknow.

¶3In pursuance of earlier order, applicant no.1 and private respondent are present and they have been duly identified by their respective counsels.

¶4It is evident from the record, that marriage of the applicant no.1 was solemnize with the private respondent on 5.6.2015 but due to some trivial issues, the F.I.R. of case in question was lodged and thereafter, charge sheet was filed and during the pendency of trial, divorce petition was filed under Section 13-B of HIndu Marriage Act with the settlement that Rs.22 lakh be paid by the applicant as alimony to the private respondent and some amount has already been deposited in the court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Lucknow.

¶5Private respondent has no objection, in case, proceeding of case in question is quashed.

¶6Learned A.G.A. have no objection, in case, impugned proceeding is quashed.

¶7Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, going through the record as well as statement of the private respondent, it is evident that prosecution case is related to the matrimonial dispute and now issue has already been resolved by way of settlement as mentioned in the petition under Section 13-B of Hindu Marriage Act, which is pending before the Family Court, Lucknow and some money has already been deposited before the court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Lucknow, therefore, the impugned proceeding has lost its efÏcacy and liable to be set aside.

¶8In view of the above, the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is allowed and the proceeding of Case No.41978 of 2018, arising out of Case Crime No.294/2017 under Section 498-A, 323, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station Alambgah, District Lucknow is quashed.

¶9OfÏce is directed to communicate this order to the learned court below forthwith. Order Date :- 19.10.2023 Gaurav/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.