- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 19 October 2023
- Bench
- Manish Mathur
- Case no.
- 8331/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 20 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8331 of 2023 Petitioner :- Ankit Panwar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Home, Govt. U.P. Lucknow And 9 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Yadav,Sanjay Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
¶2Petition has been filed seeking a direction to opposite parties to permit petitioner for training on the post of Platoon Commander in Pradeshik Armed Constabulary (P.A.C.) in pursuance of his appointment order dated 20.02.2023. Further prayer for a direction to opposite parties to ensure petitioner's joining on the aforesaid post in pursuance of his appointment order has also been made.
¶3It has been submitted that petitioner was selected for the aforesaid post for which appointment order dated 20.02.2023 was issued whereafter he was required to attend training prior to his joining but he could not attend the training on account of injury suffered by him.
¶4For the said grievance, petitioner has already submitted a representation dated 05.06.2023 but seeks liberty to file a fresh representation before the authority concerned. At present, learned counsel for petitioner restricts prayer for a decision with regard to same.
¶5Considering the innocuous prayer, without entering into merits, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before opposite party no.7 i.e. Additional Director General Training, U.P., Lucknow, who shall consider and decide the same within a period of three weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority along with fresh representation.
¶6With aforesaid observations and directions, the petition is finally disposed of. Order Date :- 19.10.2023 Mohd. Sharif High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.