VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Praveen Kumar Sagar v. State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Gram Vikas Vibhag Civil Secrt. Lko. and 3 Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
19 October 2023
Bench
Manish Mathurauthor
Case no.
8272/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 20 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8272 of 2023 Petitioner :- Praveen Kumar Sagar Respondent :- State Of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Gram Vikas Vibhag Civil Secrt. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar Yadava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.

¶2Petition has been filed for the following relief:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties, specially opposite party No. 3 to revise the petitioner's pay after providing annual increments from the date of initial appointment w.e.f. 09.05.2012.

(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to provide arrears of salary to the petitioner from 01.08.2017 to 12.10.2017 along with annual increment and then revise petitioners pay and also pay 18% interest upon the entire arrears from the due date till date of actual payment."

¶3Since consideration of petitioner's grievances would involve factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 3 i.e. District Development Officer, Lucknow which shall be considered and decided by reasoned and speaking order within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority along with fresh representation.

¶4With the aforesaid observations and directions, the petition is finally disposed of. Order Date :- 19.10.2023 Satish High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.