- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 26 October 2023
- Bench
- Abdul Moin
- Case no.
- WRIA 1034/2013
Judgment
Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1034 of 2013 Petitioner :- Jagdish Prasad Vishwakarma Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thru Its Secy.Secondary Edu.Up Civil Sectt.Andors Counsel for Petitioner :- G.C. Verma,Vijyant Nigam Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Niranjan Singh Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. (I.A. No.2 of 2023) This is an application for condonation of delay in filing the substitution application. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents no.1 and 2 and Sri Niranjan Singh, learned counsel for respondents no. 3 and 4. There is delay of eight years in filing the application. No substantive objections have been raised by the learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents no.1 and 2 and Sri Niranjan Singh, learned counsel for respondents no. 3 and 4. Accordingly, the application is allowed and the delay in filing the substitution application is hereby condoned. (I.A. No.3 of 2023) This is an application for substitution of legal heirs of the sole petitioner, who died on 03.07.2015. As the application for condonation of delay in filing the substitution application has already been allowed and learned counsels for respondents have not raised any substantive objection to the aforesaid application, instant application is also allowed. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to carryout necessary substitution during course of the day. Order on memo of the petition
¶1Heard.
¶2Instant petition has been filed praying for quashing of the order dated 25.09.2012, a copy of which is Annexure-1 to the writ petition, whereby the attachment of Sri Jagdish Prasad Vishwakarma, who was working on a Class IV post in the institution in question, was terminated and he was required to report back in his original school. During pendency of the petition, Sri Jagdish Prasad Vishwakarma has died and his son Sanjay @ Sanjay Vishwakarma has been substituted as his legal heir.
¶3At the very outset Sri Niranjan Singh, learned counsel for respondents no.3 and 4, states that he has got instructions from the respondents that whatever dues are payable to the petitioner would be paid to him within a period of six weeks from today provided the petitioner fulfills the requisite formalities.
¶4The aforesaid statement of Sri Niranjan Singh, learned counsel for respondents no.3 and 4, is recorded and the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 26.10.2023 A. Katiyar High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.