VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Shiv Kumar v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. and Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
27 October 2023
Bench
Saurabh Lavaniaauthor
Case no.
5518/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 18 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5518 of 2023 Petitioner :- Shiv Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Km.Rachna Mishra,Anil Kumar Verma,Faiz Ali Khan,Rakesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner stated that necessary parties could not be impleaded inadvertently and she may be permitted to implead the same in the array of the parties during course of the day. To the aforesaid prayer, no serious objection has been raised by the learned counsel for the State. Accordingly, the prayer is acceded. The learned counsel for petitioner is permitted to implead the necessary parties during the course of day. In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondents is dispensed with. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of Case No.1980 of 2021, Computerized Case No.D202104120001980, under Section 30(2) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 pending before the respondent No.3. Taking note of the facts as indicated in the petition as also that the application for correction of map is pending since October, 2021 as Case No.1980 of 2021, Computerized Case No.D202104120001980, though, the proceedings related to correction of map or revenue records, as the case may be, shall be decided expeditiously and on account of pendency of the aforesaid case, petitioner is suffering great hardship, this Court is of the view that indulgence of this Court is required. Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed. Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.3-Additional Collector, Barabanki to consider and decide the Case No.1980 of 2021, Computerized

Case

No.D202104120001980,

most expeditiously, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties preferably within a period of three months from the next date fixed in the case, if possible and if there is no other legal impediment in this regard. It is made clear that this Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 27.10.2023 Vinay/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.