- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 27 October 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 9401/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9401 of 2023 Petitioner :- Gokaran Prasad Sharma Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Civil Secrt. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dharmendra Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for parties.
¶2Petitioner has approached this Court for getting a direction issued to respondent no.4 to stop construction of pitch road over the Gata no.707 area 0.8910 hectare situated at Village Nanemau, Pargana Aldemau, Tehsil Jaisinghpur, District Sultanpur, of which petitioner and respondent no.27 are the Sankramniya bhumidhar and their names are recorded in revenue records.
¶3Learned Standing Counsel states that the said dispute can be decided under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 by demarcating the boundaries of plots of petitioner and also by effecting possession in case petitioner is found ousted from the land in question.
¶4In view thereof, present writ petition is disposed of, permitting the petitioner to move an application under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 before the competent authority. In case such an application is moved by petitioner within a period of two weeks from today, the Sub Divisional Magistrate concerned shall proceed and decide the same on the basis of proper survey report by a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law after hearing all parties concerned within a period of six weeks from the date such an application along with a certified copy of this order is moved before him. He shall also ensure that proceedings are taken to their logical conclusion within the aforesaid period. [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 27.10.2023 Sachin High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.