- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 27 October 2023
- Bench
- Rajnish Kumar
- Case no.
- 5482/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5482 of 2023 Petitioner :- Indrajeet Singh Respondent :- Civil Judge (Junior Division) Court Room 15, Pratapgarh And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ravi Shanker Singh Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J. Sri Ravi Shanker Singh learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the Regular suit no.1241 of 2012 (Rampyari vs Pan Kumari and another) for cancellation of sale deed, an application for amendment under Order 22 Rule 3 and Order 6 Rule 17 CPC has been filed by the respondent no.2 to 5 in the year, 2015 but the same has not been disposed of till date, despite the objection filed by the petitioner, therefore, the petitioner is constrained to approach this Court. He makes an innocuous prayer for a direction for disposal of aforesaid application within some short stipulated period and submits that now the case is fixed on 26.11.2023. Considering the nature of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to opposite parties is dispensed with. Without entering into the merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the concerned court to dispose of the application under Order 22 Rule 3 and Order 6 Rule 17 CPC expeditiously and preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no impediment, in accordance with law without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Order Date :- 27.10.2023 Harshita High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.