- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 27 October 2023
- Bench
- Rajnish Kumar
- Case no.
- 5502/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5502 of 2023 Petitioner :- Amar Nath Respondent :- Civil Judge Junior Division Haveli Ayodhya And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arvind Kumar Pathak,Vinod Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J. Heard, Shri Ram Suphal, Advocate holding brief of Shri Arvind Kumar Pathak, learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed Regular Suit No.92 of 2022 for cancellation of sale deed and for permanent injunction and the petitioner wants that the Suit may be disposed of at an early date, therefore he has approached this court Perusal of the order sheet indicates that the written statement has still not been filed. In view of above and the fact that the Suit has been filed in the year 2022 no direction can be issued at this stage merely because the petitioner wants that the Suit may be disposed of at an early date, when there is huge pendency of cases. With the aforesaid the petition is dismissed. . . ...........................................(Rajnish Kumar,J.) Order Date :- 27.10.2023 Banswar High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.