- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 27 October 2023
- Bench
- Rajnish Kumar
- Case no.
- 5512/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5512 of 2023 Petitioner :- Daya Shankar Pandey Respondent :- State Of Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission Gomti Nagar Lko Thru. Chairman And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar Yadava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J. Heard, Ms.Anupama Bhadauriya, Advocate holding brief of Shri Ashok Kumar Yadava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Ghanshyam Trivedi, learned Standing Counsel. Learned Standing Counsel raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has an alternative and statutory remedy of appeal under Section 51 of the Consumer Protection Act 2019 before the National Commission against the impugned order, which is not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner and submits that the petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to avail statutory remedy, to which there is no objection by learned Standing Counsel. In view of above, the petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as prayed for. ......................................... (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Order Date :- 27.10.2023 Banswar High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.