VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Pushpendra Tyagi v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy., Technical Education, Lucknow and Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
27 October 2023
Bench
Abdul Moinauthor
Case no.
9395/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9395 of 2023 Petitioner :- Pushpendra Tyagi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy., Technical Education, Lucknow And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pravin Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Atul Kumar Dwivedi Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent no.1 and Sri Atul Kumar Dwivedi, learned counsel for respondents no.2 and 3.

¶2No notice be issued to respondent no.4 taking into consideration the nature of order proposed to be passed.

¶3With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is being finally decided.

¶4The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner completed his B.Tech course in the year 2006 from respondent no.4-Institute. On 19.08.2016, a circular has been issued for grant of grace marks which would also be applicable to those who have passed out earlier.

¶5The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner would be entitled for grace marks in two subjects and prays that the benefit of the circular dated 19.08.2016 be also extended to the petitioner.

¶6Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a fresh representation before respondent no.2 which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned counsels for the respondents have no objection.

¶7In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before respondent no.2 then respondent no.2 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of four weeks from the date of submission of the representation along with certified copy of this order.

¶8With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed off.

¶9It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. Order Date :- 27.10.2023 A. Katiyar High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.