- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 27 October 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 9393/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9393 of 2023 Petitioner :- Suneet Kumar And 4 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhishek Srivastava,Shweta Srivastava,Vikas Verma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for parties.
¶2Petitioners have approached this Court claiming that they have been dispossessed on the basis of a common judgment and order dated 8.6.2004 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.2628 (MB) of 2004 "Hari Prasad Tiwari vs. State of U.P. and others" and Writ Petition No.2658 (MB) of 2004 "Deva Shanker Shukla vs. State of U.P. and others".
¶3In the given circumstances, petitioners have a remedy of filing a review application in the aforesaid cases, where they can claim that fraud is committed by private respondents.
¶4With the aforesaid liberty, present writ petition is consigned to record. [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 27.10.2023 Sachin High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.