Abhinava Srivastava v. State of U.P. Thru. Collector / District Magistrate Ayodhya and 4 Others

Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9392 of 2023 Petitioner :- Abhinava Srivastava Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Collector / District Magistrate Ayodhya And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for parties.

¶2Petitioner has approached this Court claiming that despite an order of the Civil Court rejecting the suit of respondent no.5 filed against the petitioner and the appeal filed against the said order being dismissed by the appellate court, the police is still siding with respondent no.5 and interfering in the possession of petitioner.

¶3It goes without saying that all police authorities are bound to give effect to the orders of the Civil Court. Therefore, respondent no.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Ayodhya is directed to ensure that compliance of order of Civil Court takes place in accordance with law without any interference by the police. The petitioner, for the said purpose, may move a representation before respondent no.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Ayodhya within a period of three days from today, who shall forthwith take appropriate action in accordance with law.

¶4With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of. [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 27.10.2023 Sachin High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench