- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 28 October 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 9404/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9404 of 2023 Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Nishad Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. U.P. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Nishad,Jagroopan Nishad,Rajesh Kumar Dhuriya Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Petitioner has approached this Court challenging the auction of fish pond made in favour of the respondent no. 9 vide order dated 11.07.2023. Learned Standing Counsel and Shri Dilip Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the Gaon Sabha concerned raises a preliminary objection that there is a delay of three months and petitioner has an alternative statutory remedy of appeal under Rule 59 of U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016. In view of the availability of alternative statutory remedy to the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to entertain this petition. This petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority in accordance with law. (Manish Kumar,J) (Vivek Chaudhary,J) Order Date :- 28.10.2023 Ashish High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.