Khaira Prasad Pandey v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Irrigation Deptt. Lucknow and 3 Others

Court No. - 20 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8360 of 2023 Petitioner :- Khaira Prasad Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Irrigation Deptt. Lucknow And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kuldeep Singh Kalhans Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of opposite parties.

¶2Petition has been filed seeking a direction to opposite parties for consideration of past services rendered by petitioner in the Department and also for correcting the date of regularization in service with effect from 27.09.2004 in place 25.05.2005 and for benefit of provision of Old Pension Scheme.

¶3Learned counsel for petitioner on the basis of instruction however does not press the first portion of prayer regarding counting of earlier services rendered in the Department and is emphasizing only on correction of date of regularization and for benefit of Old Pension Scheme.

¶4For the aforesaid grievance, petitioner has already submitted a representation but seeks liberty to file fresh representation before the authority concerned. At present learned counsel for petitioner restricts his prayer for a final decision with regard to same.

¶5Considering innocuous prayer being made by learned counsel for petitioner and without entering into the merits of the case petitioner is granted liberty to file a fresh representation before opposite party No.3 i.e. Superintending Engineer, Panchdasham Mandal Sinchiya Karya, Gonda. In case such a representation is filed, the same shall be considered and decided by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority.

¶6With the aforesaid observation, petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 28.10.2023 Subodh/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench