- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 28 October 2023
- Bench
- Manish Mathur
- Case no.
- WRIA 10719/2018
Judgment
Court No. - 20 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 10719 of 2018 Petitioner :- Devi Deen S Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Praveen Kumar,Saroj Kumar Verma,Sudhanshu Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
¶2Petition has been filed seeking a direction to opposite parties to consider petitioner's claim for grant of benefits of third A.C.P. on account of completion of 26 years of regular service along with consequential benefits, arrears of pay, difference of pension and interest thereupon.
¶3For the said grievance, petitioner has already submitted a representation before the opposite parties but seeks liberty to file a fresh representation, which will be directed to be decided.
¶4Considering the innocuous prayer, without entering into merits of the case, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before opposite party no. 2 i.e. The District Magistrate, District-Sitapur who shall consider and decide the same within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority along with fresh representation.
¶5With aforesaid observations and directions, the petition is finally disposed of. Order Date :- 28.10.2023 Satish High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.