- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 28 October 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 3305/2022
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3305 of 2022 Petitioner :- Meraj Ahmad Respondent :- The Distrcit Collector, Hardoi And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shishir Mohan,Km. Vishwa Mohini,Vimal Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State.
¶2Present writ petition is filed by the petitioner for the following main relief: "(i) That by issuing appropriate order/direction; the Opp. Parties may be commanded to take decision on the application dated 06.09.2021 Under Rule-67(5) of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016 contained in Annexure No.01 to the writ petition within reasonable time fixed by Hon'ble Court."
¶3Learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of petitioner would be sufficiently met in case application of petitioner for the said purposes is considered and decided in a time bound manner.
¶4Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the same.
¶5In view thereof, respondent no.1-District Collector, Hardoi is directed to consider and decide the pending application of the petitioner dated 6.9.2021 in accordance with law by a reasoned and speaking order after hearing all parties concerned within a period of four months from the date, a certified copy of this order is produced before him, if it has already not been decided.
¶6With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition is disposed of. [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 28.10.2023 Sachin High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.