Surendra Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko

Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12521 of 2023 Applicant :- Surendra Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Anil Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.

¶1Heard the learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Akhilesh Kumar Vyas, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records.

¶2The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 97 of 2023, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C., registered at Police Station Jethwara, District Pratapgarh.

¶3The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 27.05.2023 against the Branch Manager of Bank of Baroda stating that Rs.11,74,100/- were withdrawn from the informant's bank account in various installments.

¶4During investigation, the applicant and co-accused-Asif were arrested on 09.06.2023 from Sarita Vihar, New Delhi on the basis of information received from a mukhbir and it is alleged that in their custodial statements, both the accused persons confessed that they were involved in opening bank accounts on the basis of fake documents and getting amount transferred to those accounts, however, arrest memo of the applicant prepared on 17.06.2023 claims that the applicant was arrested on the aforesaid date at 22:17 Hours.

¶5In the affidavit filed in support of bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is innocent, he has been falsely implicated in the present case and he has no previous criminal history. After his arrest, the applicant has been implicated in six cases, details whereof has been mentioned in para 23 of the affidavit filed in support of the bail application and in a supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the State. In one of the cases, namely Case Crime No.208 of 2023, the applicant has been granted bail by means of the order dated

04.10.2023 passed by the Sessions Court, Pratapgarh.

¶6The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but he could not dispute the aforesaid aspects of the matter.

¶7Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the applicant is not named in the FIR; that there are serious discrepancies regarding the date and place of arrest of the applicant as noted above; that the applicant has already been granted bail in one of the cases, in which he has been implicated after his arrest; that the applicant has no previous criminal history and he is languishing in jail since 11.06.2023 and without making any observation, which may affect the merits of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime.

¶8Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 9 Let the applicant-Surendra Singh be released on bail in aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-

(i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence;

(ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses;

(iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. (Subhash Vidyarthi, J.) Order Date :- 30.10.2023 prateek High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench