- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 30 October 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 9439/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9439 of 2023 Petitioner :- M/S Hitaliya Traders Thru. Proprietor Ghanshyam Pal Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Nagar Vikas, Lucknow And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Shravan Kumar Verma,Sharda Verma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Namit Sharma Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
¶1Sri Yatindra Pathak, Advocate has filed his Power today on behalf of respondent no.2, which is taken on record.
¶2Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel and Sri Yatindra Pathak, learned Counsel representing respondent no.2.
¶3A similar matter has already been disposed of vide judgment dated 19.11.2015 in W.P. No. 10743(MB) of 2015, M/s Shatkashi Construction Company v. State of U.P. and others, which is not disputed by the learned counsel for the Nagar Nigam.
¶4Accordingly, this matter is also covered by the decision in the case of Tajveer Singh v. State of U.P. and others [1997 ALJ 285]. The petitioner shall also be entitled to the same benefits.
¶5The writ petition is disposed of with the said directions. [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 30.10.2023 Sachin High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.