- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 30 October 2023
- Bench
- Brij Raj Singh
- Case no.
- 10588/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 27 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10588 of 2023 Applicant :- Ram Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ashok Kumar Mishra Baled,Vimal Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Aniruddh Singh learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. The present application has been filed praying for setting aside the impugned order dated 24.6.2023 passed by ACJM, CBI,
(AP), Lucknow in Case No.420/2018 (State of U.P. Vs. Hasib Khan & others.) PS Wazirganj, under Section 406, 420 IPC. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press this anticipatory bail application. However, he has submitted that the applicant may be granted the benefit of the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in [2022 SCC Online 825]. He states that the applicant will surrender before the court below and apply for bail. It is therefore, directed that in case the applicant surrenders before the Court below within two weeks from today and prefer bail application, the court below will decide the said bail application, as expeditiously as possible, taking into account the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil (supra) and decide it in accordance with law. The application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 30.10.2023 Rajneesh JR-PS) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.