Tillu Yadav @ Vikas Yadav and 3 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Lko. and Another

Court No. - 27 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10571 of 2023 Applicant :- Tillu Yadav @ Vikas Yadav And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Gyanendra Pathak Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. Heard Ms. Juli Rastogi, holding brief of Sri Gyanendra Pathak, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Bishwa Nath Nishad, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. The present application has been filed praying for quashing the proceeding of Crl. Case No.7502 of 2020 (State. Vs. Tillu Yadav and others.) Case Crime No.13 of 2020 under Section 323, 504, 506, 308 IPC PS Ramgaon, district Bahraich pending in the Court of civil Judge/ACJM, Bahraich. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicants submits that he does not want to press this anticipatory bail application. However, he has submitted that the applicants may be granted the benefit of the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in [2022 SCC Online 825]. He states that the applicants will surrender before the court below and apply for bail. It is therefore, directed that in case the applicants surrender before the Court below within two weeks from today and prefer bail application, the court below will decide the said bail application, as expeditiously as possible, taking into account the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil (supra) and decide it in accordance with law. The application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 30.10.2023 Rajneesh JR-PS) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench